Responsibility assignment won’t solve the moral issues of artificial intelligence

Abstract Who is responsible for the events and consequences caused by using artificially intelligent tools, there a gap between what human agents can be being done artificial intelligence? Both questions presuppose that term ‘responsibility’ good tool analysing moral issues surrounding intelligence. This article will draw this presupposition into doubt show how reference to responsibility obscures complexity of situations agency, which analysed with more differentiated toolset terminology. It suggests impression gaps only occurs if we gloss over situation in tools are employed if—counterfactually—we ascribe them some kind pseudo-agential status.